Kareena kapoor and Saif come together in KJ's movie "Qurbaan"..!..!

*Kareena kapoor and beau Saif Ali Khan will come together after Tashan once again in forthcoming flick Qurbaan.Marking Rensil D Silva’s directorial debut,the film revolves around the tragic episode of 9/11 in New York and how the lives of people around the incident changed.Answering questions on whether there were similarities between Qurbaan and recently released film New York,starring John Abraham,Katrina Kaif and Neil Nitin Mukesh,the director replied,I saw “New York”.The two films are similar but I did not re-shoot my film. The two films have a different interpretation of the theme (of terrorism).While “New York” is about the aftermath of 9/11,the characters in“Qurbaan”have moved on. According to me,9/11 is no more the clinching point of global terrorism.Look at what is happening to Pakistan vis-à-vis the Taliban.Global terrorism has gone much beyond 9/11. “Qurbaan” is more about the impact of extremism.The twin towers of the World Trade Centre were attacked in 2001.Today, the reality of terrorism has changed.“Qurbaan” will reflect that reality.

The movie is being produced by Karan Johar and the producer who has been getting bolder and bolder with every successive film, has introduced a love-making scene between the real-life and reel-life couple in the film. Kareena and Saif, who play a married couple, are shown in an intimate love-making scene in the film, which the director insists is critical to the story plot. He is, however, aware of audience perceptions and is afraid that the love-making scene will over shadow the strong message that the film Is intended to deliver.He says,The love-making sequence, though absolutely essential to the film is explicit and honest enough to become a focal point of interest for the audience. There’s enough sexual repression in our country. A section of the audience might decide to see the film only to see the real-life couple making love on screen. It would be tragic.

Responding to questions on how difficult it was to have the scene shot among the rest of the crew, he defensively answered,The set had been cleared of the entire crew except the director and cameraman.“It was not an easy sequence to shoot.Kareena and Saif were thorough professionals and were able to do the difficult scene so smoothly because of their comfort level.It was an aesthetic experience. And I hope the audience treats it that way.

Kareena kapoor has reportedly requested the director to delete the love-making sequence as she is conscious about her image with the release of the scene and the film.The director,however,maintains that the sequence is integral to the development of the plot of the film.Now,we’ve to wait n watch…lol!

"Final Destination"retains lead at box office.

*Reigning champ "The Final Destination" fended off a challenge from Sandra Bullock's latest romantic comedy to lead the U.S. Labor Day holiday box office in North America for a second weekend,according to studio estimates issued on Sunday."The Final Destination," the fourth movie in a horror franchise about disastrous occurrences, earned $12.4 million during the three days beginning Friday. The 10-day haul for the Warner Bros release rose to $47.6 million, buoyed by premium pricing for 3D screenings.

Warner Bros is a unit of Time Warner Inc."All About Steve," a critical bomb starring Bullock as a lovelorn crossword-puzzle expert, followed with $11.2 million, the best performance among three weak newcomers.

That marked a considerable drop from the $33.6 million launch of her previous hit "The Proposal" in June. "All About Steve" co-star Bradley Cooper did even better that month with the $45 million debut of his summer smash "The Hangover."

But the new picture played in 2,251 theaters, about 900 less than either "The Proposal," "The Final Destination" or "The Hangover." It was also released at a time -- the dying days of summer--when the studios are clearing out underperformers so they can focus on their awards-season hopefuls.

"We're thrilled with the number,"said an official at 20th Century Fox, a unit of News Corp. Bullock also produced the movie, whose audience was about two-thirds female,according to Fox.

"Inglourious Basterds" slipped one place to No. 3 with $10.8 million, taking the three-week tally for Quentin Tarantino's World War Two picture to $91 million. It needs just $17 million more to become his biggest film in North America, a title currently held by his 1994 breakthrough "Pulp Fiction" ($108 million).

The new film's foreign total stands at $83 million, and it already ranks as Tarantino's highest-grossing release in eight markets, including Germany, Russia and Turkey.

"Basterds"was co-financed by the closely held Weinstein Co and General Electric Co's Universal Pictures.

Of the other two new releases, both targeted at male youngsters, "Gamer" opened at No. 4 with $9 million, and "Extract" at No. 10 with just under $4.2 million.

Lionsgate's "Gamer" stars Gerard Butler ("300") as a heroic killer frantically reducing the population count. Miramax Films' "Extract," another workplace satire from "Office Space" director and "Beavis and Butt-head" creator Mike Judge, stars Jason Bateman and Mila Kunis.Lionsgate is a unit of Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. Miramax is a unit of Walt Disney Co.

Michael Jackson Was the Baby Daddy!

*Now that Michael Jackson has been laid to rest, it's time to bury something else: the baby-daddy story.

Michael Jackson was his children's parent. He was his children's father. For all intents and purposes, he was the baby daddy.

Time to move along,folks.Nothing to see here.

What about Arnold Klein? What about Mark Lester? What about Macaulay Culkin?

Culkin was dragged into the story by a denounced British tabloid report. Time to move along,folks.

And even though Klein and Lester thrust themselves into the story with talk of their generous contributions, so to speak, there is still nothing to see here.

Klein and Lester, sperm donors though they may be,are not dads,daddies or baby daddies. They are, as Stephanie M. Caballero,an attorney specializing in reproductive law, explained it to us, "genetic contributors."

"If you have no other documentation, or no other action that shows you as the parent…then you're not a daddy," Caballero says.

True, anyone can challenge anything—sperm donors (such as the one in this Texas case) have even sued for custody. But when we asked Theresa Errickson, a surrogacy lawyer, whether she could recall any instance in California, Jackson's home state, in which a sperm donor prevailed, she said, "Not that I'm aware of at all."

So, to sum up, the law favors the parent. The parent being the one who is parenting. Like Michael Jackson was.

"The public wants to know who quote the 'dad' is," Caballero says, "but legally Michael Jackson is."

By all accounts and appearances, Michael Jackson's three children aren't confused about the arrangement, either. They are his children. He was their father. Those were their tears they shed after his death. If someday they want answers as to the particulars of their DNA, then that's their right.

But until that day, and maybe even after it, we don't need the record set straight by anyone other thanPrince, Paris or Blanket on something that isn't crooked. Even Klein and Lester have essentially acknowledged,if not celebrated,Jackson's fatherhood.

In the end, there is no mystery.There is no scandal.There is no story.